Town of Wallkill Top banner with photo of JohnWard


Home Page

TOW Bulletin Board
Latest Town Information

Agencies

List of Agencies
Local Government
Master Plan
Planning Board
Town Officials
Services
Ambulance Corps
Forms
Fire Departments
Libraries
Police Department
Points of Interest
Schools
Links
Wallkill Information

Agendas & Minutes
Wallkill History
Election Districts & Places of Voting
Current Information
Golf Club
Recreation
Organizations/Churches Water Quality Survey
Town Code

Contact Us
E-mail Information

D. McGoey: And then you add for a restaurant.

J. Braverman: We added another six per one thousand square feet.

A. Dulgarian: And, that’s all back here.

D. McGoey: I can’t tell you the distribution.

A. Dulgarian: I would want to make sure there is enough.

J. Braverman: One of the reasons that we confined this project to the original development in the back was because many of the retailers in the back, two retailers are there or three. It is very under traffic. It is a very unused lot. The parking lot in the back is virtually empty all the time. One of the reasons to develop it the way it was intended is to bring traffic to those retailers. I understand your concern but what we have here and I understand that the usual situation may be a dress shop or some store that generates a lot more traffic than what is there. The reality is we have a shopping center that is there and these are primarily furniture stores. One very large one that has very little traffic to it and even if it did have five or six customers, that would be a lot for it to handle. Those are large sales. What we’re trying to do is to generate enough traffic here for a healthy traffic center. We’re not in the same situation as everybody else who is already in business and throwing a restaurant in there and it’s already crowded.

G. Lake: Building #4, what’s that?

J. Braverman: Right now, we’re also negotiating with a furniture or carpet store.

P. Owen: As long as the numbers match up and with the furniture store not generating a lot of traffic, I can’t see this becoming a problem area as we have had in other places where there are retail stores that generate thousands of cars at one time.

G. Lake: Mr. McGoey’s comments. Do you have any problems with any of these other comments?

R. Duff: No I don’t.

T. Hamilton: This is the restaurant?

J. Braverman: Yes.

T. Hamilton: Does this restaurant reflect on that Site Plan the traffic of the people coming in?

J. Braverman: Yes.

T. Hamilton: Is the dumpster going to be where it shows?

J. Braverman: Yes it is. And it will be covered the same as the rest of it.

G. Lake: On the landscaping, do you feel comfortable with what you see and then leaving it up to Mr. McGoey. The Public Hearing is closed, we already did that.

T. Hamilton: What’s on the plan now? What is existing?

R. Duff: All of the lighter trees are what exists. And all the darker ones are all the new ones.

T. Hamilton: Dick, along North Galleria . . .

D. McGoey: Yes.

T. Hamilton: Do you think four additional pieces of landscape is enough to fill that in the way?

D. McGoey: In that last corner what kind of trees are you talking about?

T. Hamilton: No. I’m talking about North Galleria Drive.

R. Duff: Those are evergreens.

T. Hamilton: There are only four new ones on this landscape plan. The rest they are saying are pre-existing.

D. McGoey: The ones that are pre-existing are fairly mature except for that lower corner where you come around the curve.

T. Hamilton: The lighting?

D. McGoey: The lighting is okay.

MOTION for a NEGATIVE DECLARATION subject to Dick’s comments and the landscaping being reviewed and the dumpster made by A. Dulgarian and seconded by P. Owen.


A. Dulgarian: Aye

P. Owen: Aye

T. Hamilton: Aye

G. Monaco: Aye

G. Luenzmann: Aye

G. Lake: Aye

MOTION CARRIED. 6 AYES

MOTION for SITE PLAN/SPECIAL USE PERMIT subject to all comments made in the NEGATIVE DECLARATION made by G. Luenzmann and seconded by G. Monaco.

A. Dulgarian: Aye

P. Owen: Aye

T. Hamilton: Aye

G. Monaco: Aye

G. Luenzmann: Aye

G. Lake: Aye

MOTION CARRIED. 6 AYES


1. PUBLIC HEARING 7:40 P.M. - THE STAGING LINE - SITE PLAN/SPECIAL USE PERMIT - Carpenter Avenue (50-2-37.1) #031-003

G. Lake: Public Hearing not published in time. Unfortunately we can’t hold the Public Hearing. We understand there was a mis-understanding as we suggest that you call next


week and get the information. The only other thing, the uses of the property. You said they weren’t on the plan.

A. Jaczko: They just currently came about and it seems like it will go over very well and we would like to add it.

G. Lake: If you are considering adding it, you have to add it and you have to tell us. Why don’t you tell the whole Board what that use is? It was brought to my attention a couple of weeks ago.

A. Jaczko: A couple of things we were thinking about adding in that macadam area which is where the two r.c. tracks are being put in is a place to host burn out contests and sixty foot time trials. There really isn’t any type of zoning anywhere for what we’re asking. I don’t know if we can work with the Engineer in coming up with something. What a burn out contest is, is people in their vehicles going up into a boxed out area. We water the tires down and they run on the tires to create smoke. The crowd judges who wins the burn out and we give them a trophy. That’s pretty much what a burn out contest is. A sixty foot time trial, what you would do is mark out the sixty foot mark kind of like what we used to do years ago given them an area to go from this point to this point and whoever does it in the quickest time is the winner and that person gets a trophy. It was something that was brought to our attention by the crowd that’s been hanging out with us. There aren’t any regulations for a sixty foot time trial but thirteen twenty there is. There is the Jersey barriers that would have to be put in for something that was thirteen hundred and twenty feet but not just for sixty feet so again we’re kind of at a loss that there’s no regulation other than what we have already.
G. Lake: I think I have the idea. I think you have two options. The first option is to come back with exactly what you told us before. We will try to get you on as soon as we can. The second option, you’re going to have to go back to a work session and look through the book and decide if you want to do that.

A. Jaczko: Okay.

G. Lake: The only way I think we can get you back much before September 17, 2003 if you leave everything the same as you told us before.

A. Jaczko: Right.


G. Lake: If you want to add these items then you will have to go back to a work session and then we will put you on the first available agenda which is probably someplace in the vicinity of November 19, 2003.

A. Jaczko: I would like to get into my building before that. We will leave it alone for now and we will come back at a later date.

T. Hamilton: Now that he’s here and have it on record the work he is doing will have to cease.

G. Lake: Once you’re in the process no work is to be done.

Unidentified Person: Even though he is going to be purchasing the property?

G. Lake: That’s correct.

T. Hamilton: The burn out. Mr. McGoey is there anything about burning of rubber on to asphalt? I know the track is there now is a dirt track. Noise elevations. What’s going to happen here with the noise?

D. McGoey: We definitely have safety issues.

G. Monaco: The safety is my concern.

G. Lake: Right now, what he wants to do is get back on for the Public Hearing for exactly what he did.

MOTION to schedule a PUBLIC HEARING for September 17, 2003 made by A. Dulgarian and seconded by P. Owen.

A. Dulgarian: Aye

P. Owen: Aye

T. Hamilton: Aye

G. Monaco: Aye

G. Luenzmann: Aye

G. Lake: Aye

MOTION CARRIED. 6 AYES


2. PUBLIC HEARING 7:45 P.M. - PETCO GROOMING - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - North Galleria Drive (78-2-2.1) #023-003

G. Lake: Public Hearing started at 8:40 P.M. M. Hunt read the Public Hearing notice.

M. Hunt: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a PUBLIC HEARING of the Planning Board of the Town of Wallkill, Orange County, New York, will be held at the Town Hall at 600 Route 211 East, in said Town, on th 6th day of August, 2003 at 7:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard that day on the application of Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. for approval of a Special Use Permit for grooming services at 600 North Galleria Drive, south of Route 211 under Section 249-39 of the Zoning Law of the Town of Wallkill. All parties of interest will be heard at said time and place. S/G. Lake, Chairman

J. Mirro: I’m the Attorney for the applicant. I’m here with Susan Benemo who is an Assistant Manager at Petco. We’re here for a Special Use Permit to establish a small portion of the store that exists at 600 North Galleria Drive as a grooming service. I didn’t prepare the application. I was retained afterwards. I don’t know if the Board received this drawing.

G. Lake: They saw that. We know that it’s all basically there. Let me go through the Board.

A. Dulgarian: Nothing.

P. Owen: Nothing.

G. Luenzmann: Nothing.

G. Monaco: Nothing.

T. Hamilton: Nothing.

G. Lake: Is there anybody who wishes to comment on this application?


MOTION to close this PUBLIC HEARING at 8:42 P.M. made by A. Dulgarian and seconded by P. Owen.

A. Dulgarian: Aye

P. Owen: Aye

T. Hamilton: Aye

G. Monaco: Aye

G. Luenzmann: Aye

G. Lake: Aye

MOTION CARRIED. 6 AYES

G. Lake: Any other comments?

A. Dulgarian: We’ve seen this. It is reasonable. Low impact.

MOTION for a NEGATIVE DECLARATION made by P. Owen and seconded by A. Dulgarian.

A. Dulgarian: Aye

P. Owen: Aye

T. Hamilton: Aye

G. Monaco: Aye

G. Luenzmann: Aye

G. Lake: Aye

MOTION CARRIED. 6 AYES

MOTION for SPECIAL USE PERMIT made by P. Owen and seconded by G. Luenzmann.

A. Dulgarian: Aye

P. Owen: Aye

T. Hamilton: Aye

G. Monaco: Aye

G. Luenzmann: Aye

G. Lake: Aye

MOTION CARRIED. 6 AYES


3. WEINERT RECYCLING - SITE PLAN/SPECIAL USE PERMIT - Route 211 East (41-1-82) #071-002

CANCELLED.


4. GOTTLIEB - ZONE CHANGE REQUEST - MI to R2 - Route 211 East (47-1-1.1)

CANCELLED.


5. ZEFFIRO - ZONE CHANGE REQUEST - MI to RA - Stony Ford Road (61-1-39.22)

G. Lake: You want to change the zone from MI to RA? Dick, have you seen this?

D. McGoey: Yes.

G. Lake: Do they touch RA?

D. McGoey: It does not appear that the lot is contiguous to any other lands located in the RA zone therefore, it should be considered spot zoning.


G. Lake: Right.

B. Faro: What does that mean?

G. Lake: Basically we’re not allowed to turn around and create spot zoning. We don’t get into this. We recommend it to the Town but you must have been to the Town Board and they sent you here for our recommendation.

B. Faro: Right.

G. Lake: We send it to them back.

B. Faro: This is the first place we’ve been.

G. Lake: You haven’t been to the Town Board yet?

N. Zeffiro: No. This is the first place. Carol Kelly gave us a letter to come here.

T. Hamilton: Wasn’t the letter to John Ward?

N. Zeffiro: That’s right. I sent the letter to John Ward. My mother wants to move up and the rest of our family are all here and have houses.

P. Owen: They referred it to us?

N. Zeffiro: Okay.

G. Lake: Mr. Barone, can we go ahead and set a Public Informational Hearing?


Page 4