MOTION to TABLE for further review made by A.
Dulgarian and seconded by P. Owen.
A.
Dulgarian: Aye
P.
Owen: Aye
R.
Carr: Aye
T.
Hamilton: Aye
G.
Monaco: Aye
G.
Lake: Aye
MOTION
CARRIED. 6 AYES
2. PUBLIC HEARING 7:35 P.M. - ROWLEY DEVELOPMENT - SITE PLAN/SPECIAL
USE PERMIT - Bloomingburg Road (14-1-53.2) #033-003
G.
Lake: Public Hearing started at 8:21 P.M. M. Hunt read the Public
Hearing notice.
M.
Hunt: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a PUBLIC HEARING of the Planning
Board of the Town of Wallkill, Orange County, New York, will be
held at the Town Hall at 600 Route 211 East, in said Town, on
the 5th day of November, 2003 at 7:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter
as the matter can be heard that day on the application of Rowley
Development Corp., 30-40 Golf Links Road, Middletown, New York
10940 for approval of Special Use Permits for Office, Exercise/Dance
Studio & Warehouse/Retail Uses for existing building under
PID Zoning Location: 120 Bloomingburg Road (County Route 76) ½
mile North of Route 302 intersection under Section 249-28 of the
Zoning Law of the Town of Wallkill. All parties of interest will
be heard at said time and place. S/Gary Lake, Chairman
W. Abt: I am the architect for the owners. With me is Brian Rivenburgh
who is one of the owners.
G.
Lake: Give us a brief description and then we will open it to
the Public.
W.
Abt: This is an existing building on Route 17 and County Route
76. The building is about nine thousand square feet. It originally
had a warehouse and an individual insurance company when it was
built. Rowley bought the property years ago but didn’t realize
they needed a Special Use Permit for all the tenants. There are
three tenants in the building now, one of them is an air conditioning
outfit that uses part of the building for their warehouse. Fastenal
has a warehouse/retail in part of the building. There is also
a dance studio and about five hundred square feet of office area
in the front of the building. This is in a PID zone and it requires
a Special Use Permit for all uses.
G.
Lake: Let me go through the Board before the Public.
A.
Dulgarian: Nothing.
P.
Owen: Nothing.
R.
Carr: Nothing.
G.
Monaco: Nothing.
T.
Hamilton: Nothing.
G.
Lake: Is there anyone from the Public who wishes to comment on
this application?
MOTION
to close this PUBLIC HEARING at 8:24 P.M. made by A. Dulgarian
and seconded by P. Owen.
A.
Dulgarian: Aye
P.
Owen: Aye
R.
Carr: Aye
T.
Hamilton: Aye
G. Monaco: Aye
G.
Lake: Aye
MOTION
CARRIED. 6 AYES
G.
Lake: Let me go through the Board once again.
A.
Dulgarian: Nothing.
P.
Owen: I’m fine with it.
R.
Carr: Nothing.
G.
Monaco: Nothing.
T.
Hamilton: Just as long as it complies with Mr. McGoey’s
comments.
MOTION
for a NEGATIVE DECLARATION made by P. Owen and seconded by G.
Monaco.
A.
Dulgarian: Aye
P.
Owen: Aye
R.
Carr: Aye
T.
Hamilton: Aye
G.
Monaco: Aye
G.
Lake: Aye
MOTION
CARRIED. 6 AYES
MOTION for SITE PLAN/SPECIAL USE PERMIT subject to D. McGoey’s
comments made by P. Owen and seconded by T. Hamilton.
A.
Dulgarian: Aye
P.
Owen: Aye
R.
Carr: Aye
T.
Hamilton: Aye
G.
Monaco: Aye
G.
Lake: Aye
MOTION
CARRIED. 6 AYES
3. SCOTCH VALLEY - 44 LOT SUBDIVISION - Silver Lake Scotchtown
Road (99–1-1) #006-003
L.
Potter: I’m with Lanc & Tully representing the owners
of Scotch Valley. We are presently waiting to have a field determination
by the Army Corps of Engineers which has been scheduled for November
15, 2003 for the project. This is a forty four residential project
on thirty one and a half acres located on Silver Lake Scotchtown
Road. We have been before the Board before. We have addressed
several of Mr. McGoey’s comments. We are presently under
design for the water connection to Tower Drive and we would like
to request and schedule a Public Hearing.
G.
Lake: I read this off as a fifty three lot. That’s what
is was?
L.
Potter: That was originally when we first came before the Board.
G.
Lake: So, you are now down to forty four lots?
L.
Potter: Correct.
G.
Lake: Let me go through the Board to get their comments.
A. Dulgarian: It is too busy for me.
P.
Owen: Nothing.
R.
Carr: I don’t agree with the flag lots for this project.
I also feel there are too many houses packed on this site.
L.
Potter: The site has a lot of wetlands on it. It was very restricted
to where we could put the detention ponds. We have to look at
those areas where the drainage would be going to.
We do plan on addressing that and also addressing the landscaping
comments. Your other issue as far as the flag lots were concerned,
we previously had a different layout and upon the recommendation
of the Board and your engineer, we opted to put in those two or
three flag lots to make the project work a little better.
G.
Monaco: It looks too busy and too crowded in my opinion.
T.
Hamilton: We need the final delineation as was mentioned in Mr.
McGoey’s comments. Is this in the roadway improvements?
G.
Lake: Yes.
L.
Potter: We don’t anticipate a lot of changes as far as the
delineation is concerned. However, we decided that we would wait
for the delineation before we proceeded with further engineering.
We would like to have a Public Hearing scheduled at this time.
G.
Lake: So, this could change between now and you come back?
L.
Potter: In my opinion probably with minor changes.
G.
Lake: I don’t have a lot against flag lots in rural sections.
Seeing it on paper . . .
L.
Potter: We had that before you before with the flag lots shown.
G.
Lake: You are here on a work in progress and I just think if you
can take a little look at it and space them a little bit. Dick,
do you have anything at this point or add before we schedule the
Public Hearing?
D.
McGoey: They should have another work session.
L. Potter: We will have another work session before the Public
Hearing.
G.
Lake: Are you scheduled for one yet?
L.
Potter: No. I will call the office to get scheduled.
MOTION
to schedule a PUBLIC HEARING for February 18, 2004 made by T.
Hamilton and seconded by R. Carr.
A.
Dulgarian: Aye
P.
Owen: Aye
R.
Carr: Aye
T.
Hamilton: Aye
G.
Monaco: Aye
G.
Lake: Aye
MOTION
CARRIED. 6 AYES
4. HASBROUCK - 16 LOT SUBDIVISION - Goshen Turnpike (44-1-64.222)
#090-002
D.
Yanosh: I am the surveyor for the project.
G.
Lake: Why don’t you bring us up to speed to where you are.
D. Yanosh: We were here the last time and it was tabled. We did
finish the survey. We completed the topographic contours. The
buffer zone that you see on there in the wetlands line is delineated.
They are delineated buffers for the Department of Environmental
Conservation. I will supply you with a copy of the one signed
off by the Department of Environmental Conservation. They have
all been delineated and located. I did arrange the lots so it
meets the zone. The acreage meets the zoning from when the application
was submitted over a year ago. The minimum lot size is fifteen
thousand square feet. All the lots are over that right now. Some
of them are much larger. A lot of the land is in the buffer zone
and wetland area. Lot #16 is fronted on Goshen Turnpike. It’s
down at the end. The majority of the property, as you can see,
is all in the wetlands. We have the sewer and water line shown
going into the street. One of Dick’s comments, is the storm
water management plan. We will be working on that as we go along
here. Orange County Department of Public Works has reviewed the
plan. I have to do some revisions with the profile and stuff.
So far they have no problem with the location of my roadway entrance.
This came in at a ninety degree angle to Goshen Turnpike, fifty
foot wide road into a right-of-way and a thirty foot wide pavement.
G.
Lake: Let me go through the Board.
A.
Dulgarian: I have nothing at this time.
P.
Owen: I have nothing.
R. Carr: I would like to see the houses moved back.
D.
Yanosh: Most of the lots are ninety five feet or over one hundred
feet wide.
G.
Monaco: How far is the buffer zone?
D.
Yanosh: They probably have a sixty foot backyard.
T.
Hamilton: Not at this time.
G.
Lake: Dick, do you have any other comments? Can we schedule the
Public Hearing?
D.
McGoey: The detention ponds may have an affect on a number of
the lots.
D.
Yanosh: We can do the same thing. I will have a work session before.
I will get the sixty scale maps drawn.
T.
Hamilton: Dick, is there anything that has to go to the County
on this?
D.
McGoey: It is a County road.
G. Lake: This has sewer and water, right?
D.
Yanosh: Yes.
MOTION
to schedule a PUBLIC HEARING for February 18, 2004 made by T.
Hamilton and seconded by P. Owen.
A.
Dulgarian: Aye
P.
Owen: Aye
R.
Carr: Aye
T.
Hamilton: Aye
G.
Monaco: Aye
G.
Lake: Aye
MOTION
CARRIED. 6 AYES
5.
C’EST LE VIE BEAUTY SPA - EXPANSION - SITE PLAN - 552 Route
17M (37-10-6.2) #-68-003
P. Higby: I am the architect for the owner at 552 Route 17M. The
overview of the project is it’s a l.3 acre site on Route
17M just beyond the City of Middletown limits. Basically the property
has a current existing two-story single family residence as well
as the existing C’est Le Vie Beauty Salon which is basically
on 1,460 square feet on the first floor and the second floor has
a non-accessory office of approximately 750 square feet. The intent
is to put an addition on the back of the beauty salon, a 5,408
square foot addition which would make the beauty salon in the
neighborhood of 6,400 square feet. The intent is to keep the existing
single family residence. We have gone before the Zoning Board
of Appeals. Our method to that was that we basically needed a
variance for parking. In the event that we didn’t get a
variance for parking the project was not valid. We had gone to
a work session with Mr. McGoey and he came up with the parking
required on the basis of the zoning ordinance of seventy four
spaces. Strictly on the basis of the zoning ordinance the classification
of spa in the zoning ordinance whereas when we went through there
were several areas in the building. There is a small retail shop
in the front where they could purchase supplies. There is going
to be a beauty salon which is a separate category from the spa
as well as the spa so, we have three separate categories as opposed
to one category. Using those three categories we applied it to
the zoning ordinance as we came up with the spa plus the office
upstairs, plus the single family residence we came up with fifty
six spaces.
