TOWN
OF WALLKILL ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
July
14, 2003
MEETING OPENING:
Present:
James Mattatall
William Morgan
Ellis Oster
James Owen
Oral Smith, Chairperson
Priscilla Thompson
Joseph A. Owen, Esq.
Excused:
J. Cieslewitz
The
monthly meeting of the Town of Wallkill Zoning Board of Appeal
opened with the pledge to the flag, followed by the roll call
and presentation of the June 9, 2003 Meeting Minutes.
Mr.
Smith: The Motion is made to accept the minutes as written;
Seconded; All in favor; Motion carried.
The
following Hearing Reviews were conducted and Public Hearings
heard, discussed and voted upon as noted.
HEARING REVIEWS (August 11, 2003)
ERIC
HOSDAGHIAN: Sign variance.
Mr.
Smith: This is a re view of your application. You wish to install
a main sign at the entrance of the mall.
Mrs.
Thompson: How big is it, is it free-standing?
E.
Hosdaghian: The sign going over there is a little higher than
the Code.
Mr.
Oster: Do you know at this time so when we inspect we know what
height? What height do you want it to be?
E.
Hosdaghian: Its there on the drawing.
Mr.
Oster: The drawing I have is just a little RED mark on your
plot plan; I don’t see any numbers for the sign.
E.
Hosdaghian: I have that – it is first to be in front of
you.
Mr.
James Owen: We don’t have that.
E.
Hosdaghian: You don’t have that?
Mr.
Oster: This one, we do not have.
E.
Hosdaghian: It is 20 feet from the ground.
Mr.
Oster: I thought you said 35 feet height?
Mrs.
Thompson: If its going to be 15 feet from the property line
I believe.
E.
Hosdaghian: Its 20.
Mr.
Oster: It has to be the height of your sign or 15 feet which
ever is greater. So if sign is 20 feet you have to be 20 feet
off.
E.
Hosdaghian: That is what I did in the drawing there.
Mr.
Oster: Your only problem is the height?
E.
Hosdaghian: Yes; I do have room for it.
Mr.
Oster: Who directed you to come here on the 25th “a free
standing sign shall be no more than 35ft in height above the
finished grade”.
E.
Hosdaghian: When I applied the building inspector said I had
to come here for the height; if I don’t need it, fine.
Mrs.
Thompson: This is the height from the ground to the top of the
sign we are talking about.
Mr.
Oster: If we had had this we could have reviewed – I thought
you were….
E.
Hosdaghian: …it came with my application, I did put. This
is what it is 20 feet from the ground to the top of the sign.
Mr.
Oster: And you are 20 feet from the road?
E.
Hosdaghian: Yes.
Mr.
Oster: And 20 feet from either side.
E.
Hosdaghian: Correct.
Mr.
Oster: I am seeing it 249-11 Page 249-32. “shall not exceed
35 feet in height…” the design shall be designed
with 100 mph but that – there is no bearings on that.
Mr.
Smith: Correct.
Mr.
Oster: That’s an engineering problem.
E.
Hosdaghian: Which we have done according to…
Mrs.
Thompson: Double side?
E.
Hosdaghian: Double side, yes.
Mrs.
Thompson : What is the square footage?
E.
Hosdaghian: Its greater than what it is – was before.
The only problem I have is the height.
Mr.
Smith: The signage on the building as well.
Mr.
Oster: He said he was here for the height only.
E.
Hosdaghian: For the height.
Mr.
Oster: All your square footage on the building by Code, you
still have enough for this?
E.
Hosdaghian: Yes. And this the reason I am showing I am 20 feet
from the – you know.
Mr.
Smith: It says 90 mph.
Mr.
Oster: I am not giving a variance for that.
Mr.
Smith: I know that.
Mr.
Oster: Why don’t we look into it and be in touch with
you.
Mr.
Smith: That is what we are going to have to do.
E.
Hosdaghian: Okay.
Mr.
Oster: To make sure that is why you are here.
Mr.
Smith: Can we keep one of these?
E.
Hosdaghian: Sure, by all means.
Mr.
Oster: If this goes up, will that ugly temporary sign of yours
go down.
E.
Hosdaghian: Yes sir. Because nobody sees me inside. They always
tell me ‘where are you, where are you?’, you know.
One is enough Mr. Chairman?
Mr.
Smith: Yes.
Mr.
Oster: Do you have one for each of us?
Mr.
Smith: He only has two (2).
Mr.
Oster: You feel the others are in the mail to us?
E.
Hosdaghian: Yes. But only one like this.
Mr.
Oster: Do we have your number on file there?
[Review
was made of the Code by the Board Members]
Mr.
Smith: If what you gave us is correct, I don’t see why
you need a variance. We will look into this and we will contact
you either way. We have your contact numbers.
Mr.
James Owen: It says ‘main sign’.
Mr.
Smith: There is signage on that building I thought it might
have to do with the total amount of signage.
E.
Hosdaghian: The building inspector sent me because of the height.
Mr.
Oster: Its on 211 where the bridal place is, Olympus Gym.
E.
Hosdaghian: We want to put it right at the end so people can
see.
Mr.
James Owen: Okay.
Mr.
Oster: We don’t want to hold you up a month either. Are
you familiar with how to mail out the mailings to go forward.
Mr.
Smith: In the event there is a variance needed – I will
explain what you have to do at that time. You have to mail out
by certified mail to all your neighbors but will explain that
to you in detail at that time.
ANTHONY R. FLYNN, SR.
Applicant’s
representative: I am here for Tony.
David
– I am buying the house from him.
Mr.
Smith: You are asking for set back from 5.0’ to 0.0’
feet.
Mrs.
Thompson: Is the property 232 Highland?
David:
Yes. I don’t live there I am purchasing the house from
him – the Highland Extension, yes. He is in the Marines
and he is going back so.
Mrs.
Thompson: We just said the location was on ‘Highland Avenue
Ext’.
Mr.
Smith: “323” is what we have.
David
– Yes.
Mr.
Smith: Do you know how long the garage has been there?
David
– ’73. The house has been sold three (3) times since
then and never caught. When we did the title search this time
we saw there was no CO on it so we started this process so we
could do everything right so when I had the house I don’t
have any problems when I rent it or what ever we end up doing
with it. I went with Tony and spoke with the Town / building
department. They show it – its been on the tax maps since
’73 or ’75 so it was done prior to that. Its been
on record. It was done at same time the addition of the house
was done.
Mr.
Oster: Will Mr. Flynn be here a month from now or will you represent
him then too?
David
– I thought it was going to be done tonight. I did not
know exactly where we were at with the situation.
Mr.
Smith: If this is no problem we will go ahead with it. I’ll
give you instructions on mailings .
David
– whatever has to be done. If it has to be the fact he
has to come out of there and get a leave for a couple of days
to come back up.
Mr.
Oster: It’s the ZBA’s purpose to make the application
and then next month hold the hearing. I feel you might need
something signed by Mr. Flynn considering he is the one who
signed the application. He can mail something to saying you
can represent him here.
David
– he called the building department and told them I was
coming and he gave his attorney power of attorney for the house,
so but he can fax me a letter.
Mr.
Oster: There may even be a FORM in the building department there
that you are representing him.
Mrs.
Thompson: Can he come himself?
David
– he is in the Marines. They just brought him back to
Florida I know he was in Hati or something.
Mr.
Smith: I Move to hold a Public Hearing for Anthony R. Flynn,
Sr on August 11, 2003 at 7:30 pm or as soon thereafter as the
matter can be heard; Seconded; All in favor; Motion carried.
Mr.
Smith: It is necessary to notify everyone within 300 feet of
your property. You can obtain the list of names from the Town
Tax Office. The notice of the Public Hearing will be in the
Times Herald Record’s Public Notice Section within the
week. Take that notice, copy it and mail it to everyone on the
list at least 10 days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
Mailings can be sent either by certified or registered mail.
Bring proof of mailings with you to open your public hearing.
Mr.
Smith: This will be in the Times Herald Record’s Legal
Notice later in the week.
David
– how soon can we get this resolved?
Mr.
Smith: The public hearing is next month. A decision is made
that night and its on record the next day. The Tax Office has
the list of names.
TECTONIC ENGINEERING & SURVEYING CONSULTING, PC.
Michael
Bluestein, Esq. and Don Smallick, Tectonic Engineering: We are
here to represent 751 Rt 211 East LLC. We are looking for use
variance. It is somewhat of an unusual request. You know where
the old Archie’s is…?
Mr.
Oster: …you are taking off too much dirt aren’t
you?
M.
Bluestein: That is the problem. The applicant did not realize
they were using the dirt for some other locations they own and
got a stop work order from the Building Department and said
we had to get a mining permit. Most people think of a mining
permit dynamite blasting and blasting out rock – all they
are looking to do is level the site to bring it down to the
Rt 211 level which is what the rest of the 211 corridor is like
so that when used for commercial purpose – no one wants
a strip mall or building 25 feet above the highway. What we
are looking to do is bring the road down to a level consistent
with the rest of Rt 211.
Mr.
Oster: And you are kind of filling in that lower spot, right?
M.
Bluestein: We have other sites in town, we are looking to move
the dirt.
Mr.
Oster: I have seen that hill go down but also seen loose dirt
over to the side. So some of this is coming down the hill –
is that yours?
Don
Smallik: What ever we do it has to be consistent with the DEC
mining permit.
Mr.
Smith: This is a temporary activity?
M.
Bluestein: Correct. What we are really looking to do is get
temporary use variance to basically allow us to get a mining
permit because mining is not allowed in this part of town. Again
we are not mining it for commercial purposes just level it to
the roadway to make it more consistent with the rest of the
area and we can’t do anything without the DEC mining permit
and the application asks if mining is allowed under the current
zone – we check off NO and they send the application right
back and say ‘come back when you have an approval’.
We need something temporary to bring the road back down to level
after you get that permit within ‘x’ amount of time,
we are not selling – we are using the fill ourselves for
other places, not blasting or selling. We are just bulldozing
and machinery and bringing it down to what ever the DEC permits
lets us and then we are done and it will be nice piece of property
for someone to develop for commercial purposes.
Mrs.
Thompson: If we give you a use variance you still need DEC permission?
M.
Bluestein: Yes, entirely. We have to conform to all their regs
and from this Board we are seeking a temporary variance to allow
us to go to the DEC to get that to bring it down so it makes
it all look nice.
Mr.
Smith: I Move to hold a Public Hearing for August 11, 2003 at
7:30 pm or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard; Seconded;
All in favor; Motion carried.
Mr.
Smith: It is necessary to notify everyone within 300 feet of
your property. You can obtain the list of names from the Town
Tax Office. The notice of the Public Hearing will be in the
Times Herald Record’s Public Notice Section within the
week. Take that notice, copy it and mail it to everyone on the
list at least 10 days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
Mailings can be sent either by certified or registered mail.
Bring proof of mailings with you to open your public hearing.
WILLIAM MORRISON (not present)
CONTINUATION:
RICHARD
& JOANNE GAGLIANO (Interpretation)
Asa
Lennon: RJ Smith Realty and represent M/M Gagliano, 64 Decker
Lane.
Nancy
Durey: Representing Joseph Cidoti who is the purchaser of the
property, Mr. Gagliano can’t be here this evening.
Asa
Lennon: What we did was we found the after going through the
zoning book, went to RA zoning and found multi-family is permitted
and specifications are in here.
Mr.
Smith: We know that but that was not the question.
Mr.
James Owen: The question was if the property used legally.
Mr.
Oster: You were looking for an interpretation.
Nancy
Durey: What we need is – Mr. Cidoti is purchasing the
property as it is currently a 2 family home the way it is constructed
and set up. We want to be sure if he purchases this that he
is able to continue the use of what he is buying right now.
Not come back later on and say ‘ you have to take it apart’.
I have copy of the assessor’s property card that shows
in 1977 they went in and verified this was existing 2 family
back then.
Mr.
James Owen: Exactly.
Mr.
Smith: There was a question if it has been used continuously
as a 2 family.
Nancy
Durey: Yes, its always been and Mr. Gagliano lived there and
the tenant lived in the apartment.
Mr.
Smith: Can you up-date us on what you were going to do with
the trailer?
Nancy
Durey: The trailer was not an issue as far as the Town was,
that’s always been there.
Asa
Lennon: They had no problem with that they notified the Gagliano’s
attorney that that was a fine use for it.
Mrs.
Thompson: Has it always been lived in?
Nancy
Durey: Yes.
Asa
Lennon: Please understand this, the only reason we are doing
this is because…no one ever said no you can’t do
this, we are doing it on behalf of both clients to make sure
there was not an issue at any point.
Mrs.
Thompson: We ask these questions so we know what the situation
is.
Asa
Lennon: We understand.
Next
Page